If you are evaluating alternatives to SplitMetrics for Apple Search Ads, here is a neutral rundown of what to weigh and where SearchAds Radar fits.
In short
SplitMetrics offers Apple Search Ads automation (SplitMetrics Acquire) and product-page A/B testing (SplitMetrics Optimize). If you want an AI agent that analyzes Apple Search Ads against real revenue and drafts the changes and connects to your own AI client, SearchAds Radar is an agent-native alternative: it ties ASA spend to RevenueCat subscription revenue and SDK attribution, surfaces daily insights, and optimizes campaigns through a propose→confirm flow or via its MCP server.
SplitMetrics provides Apple Search Ads automation through SplitMetrics Acquire and product-page experimentation through SplitMetrics Optimize, aimed at scaling paid user acquisition and improving conversion.
For Apple Search Ads management, yes. SearchAds Radar takes an agent-native approach, an AI agent that analyzes your account and proposes optimizations you approve, with revenue attribution built in. SplitMetrics also offers product-page A/B testing, which is a separate capability.
No. SearchAds Radar focuses on Apple Search Ads optimization and revenue analytics. If you specifically need App Store product-page experimentation, that is a distinct capability offered by testing-focused tools.
It reviews your account daily, surfaces anomalies and budget leaks, and proposes multi-step changes to bids, budgets, and keywords. Nothing touches your live campaigns until you approve the plan.
Yes, through its MCP server: connect from Claude, Cursor, or any MCP-compatible client.
Start free and see how an agent-native workflow compares on your own campaigns.